Menu
Programme
Prices
Location
Registration Information
|
Abstracts Gears2011
|
| |
Propulsion System Developments to meet Future RN Requirements
Peter Hopkins - MoD Navy
|
| |
Finite Element Stress Analysis for Advanced Aerospace Gears
Tim Lisle - Design Unit, Newcastle University
Traditional gear stress analysis techniques based on ISO 6336:2006 and AGMA 2101:D04 are empirically based, comparator methods for the analysis of contact and bending fatigue safety factors. Large discrepancies between the stresses established using ISO 6336:2006 and AGMA 2101-D04 makes them unreliable for the analysis of safety critical aerospace gears without extensive testing.
A new gear stress analysis technique is being developed in conjunction with Rolls Royce Plc using commercially available, general purpose Finite Element Analysis software (FEA) running on a High Performance Computing (HPC) system.
Comparisons between ISO6336:2006, AGMA2101-D04 and the FEA method will be discussed and compared to FEA model validation results. The accuracy, meshing strategies and limitations of the methods will be presented. |
| |
Additive Layer Manufacturing - State of the Art
Prof Phill Dickens & Prof Richard Hague - Loughborough University
Additive Manufacturing is a new tern that has been adopted by ASTM to cover the techniques that build parts by adding material and covers processes such as Stereolithography and Laser Sintering. The processes were originally used in the design world to manufacture prototypes but have now progressed to the production of end use parts. The main advantage of these processes is the freedom from tooling and the ability to produce highly complex geometries. A number of processes are now available for manufacturing metal parts and these are quickly being adopted in a variety of sectors. This presentation will suggest some opportunities for manufacturing high value gears by these processes. |
| |
The Design Challenges of Transmissions for Greener Energy Applications
Paul Bradley - Allen Gears
|
| |
Transmission Design through Failure Analysis
Mike Mountney - Rolls Royce PLC
|
|
Contemporary Face Gears - A Real Alternative to Bevels?
Michael Sykes et al - Centa Transmissions
Face gear design allows a wide variety of geometries and the facility to take multiple drives off a single face. Axial freedom of the pinion, free choice of axis angles and easy assembly are additional advantages which led this type of angular gears win market shares compared to bevel gears. The presentation summarises the development of the face gear technology over the last 20 years and highlights recent improvements on geometry, stiffness and surface optimisation of Cylkro® face gears of ASSAG, Switzerland. Actual applications, such as differentials in middle class cars and power-driven vehicles as well as multiple outputs in the field of renewable energy plants are illustrated and compared to bevel gear solutions.
|
| |
International Calculation Method for Micropitting
Dr Stefan Beermann - KISSsoft AG
Micropitting is a phenomenon that, compared to pitting or root fracture, occurs relatively seldom and is often tolerable. However, due to an increasing number of high precision gears running at the technical limit, especially in the wind turbine business, the effect of Micropitting is becoming more important. It can happen in Hertzian contacts with rolling and sliding, such as on gear flanks, operating in boundary lubrication regimes. The probability of Micropitting depends mainly on the surface roughness and the properties of the lubricant.
The international calculation method for Micropitting, ISO TR 15144:2010, was recently published. It is the first official international calculation method to check for the risk of Micropitting. The German FVA published methods in the 1990s, with a first method that was only checking the situation at one contact point, and a second approach, some years later, extending the investigation over the whole flank. AGMA published a method at the beginning of this millennium for the calculation of the specific oil film thickness containing some comments about Micropitting, partly referring back to the FVA papers. The ISO TR is based on this precedent work. New in the technical report is the calculation of Micropitting safety factors.
An ISO TR is a Technical Report, which, normally after 3 years, will become an International Standard. Over recent years, Micropitting has become a very important topic in gearbox design, especially for wind turbines. Therefore, even before the official publication, the evaluation of Micropitting risk, based on ISO 15144, was requested by some authorities, such as the Germanische Lloyd (Lloyds Register of Germany).
In this paper the outline of the ISO TR 15144 and its preceding methods is presented. The technical report presents two calculation rules, methods A and B. Method A is based on knowledge about the values for the Hertzian pressure at every contact point, based on an accurate calculation of the meshing of the gear pair. This should take into consideration tooth and shaft deflections to obtain the load distribution over the flank line in every meshing position. Such a calculation is very time consuming when using FEA. Alternatively, specific analytical programs such as LDP, RIKOR or KISSsoft may be used. In either case, the use of Method A without such an advanced tool is impossible.
Method B is much simpler; the load distribution is defined for different cases such as spur or helical gears and with or without profile modifications. However, a restriction, which arose in the last meeting of the ISO working group responsible for this topic, considerably limits the application of method B: If gears with profile modification have to be verified, the tip relief (Ca) has to correspond exactly to a proposed value Ceff. If not, the method for gears without any profile modifications has to be used. As modern gear design implies profile modifications of different kinds, this is a critical limitation for the application of method B in ISO TR 15144. It therefore prevents the design of the profile modifications to reduce the risk of Micropitting.
The risk of Micropitting is highly influenced by profile and flank line modifications. An extension of the contact analysis in KISSsoft can systematically vary the applied modifications of a given gear set in combination with diverse torque levels. This allows the evaluation of Micropitting risk using method A. The results are presented in a table, showing the safety factor against Micropitting for different subsets of profile/flank modifications, depending on the torque level. Additionally, Peak-to-Peak-Transmission-Error, maximum Hertzian stress, wear etc. is also documented. This is a powerful tool to show the possibilities to reduce the Micropitting risk with profile modifications and is very helpful for the design of an optimal gear modification. An example of an application using this tool to optimize modifications will be presented. |
| |
The International Standards Process for Gears
Dr Rob Frazer - Design Unit, Newcastle University
& BS Committee MCE/5 Gears
Gear Standards published by ISO are numerous, complex and appear to change without warning. The general perception of users of these standards is they appear out of the ether, and when applied to their specific application, results don’t agree with experience. This presentation will try and banish this perception by describing the process of how gear standards are prepared and revised within the International Standards Organisation (ISO) and how the UK national body, BSI, supports this activity. It will show how and why you can get involved.
The BGA plays an important role in the international gear community by actively participating in the development of ISO gear standards. It is probably one of the most important tasks it undertakes, but few people are aware of this. The work is undertaken by volunteers nominated by the BGA and supported by small UK based working groups. Participation in these working groups is not time consuming and it gives you the opportunity to ensure an International Standard will meet your Company requirements.
The presentation will describe the process of ISO standard development and revision. The different types of ISO publications will be explained and some key interpretation issues will be described.
Some important limitations in the standards will be described and why it is important to continue to research and develop these areas.
|
| |
The Development of Transmissions for Military Vehicles
Dave Simner - Defence Academy
This presentation will briefly review the requirements for military vehicles and outline what place the transmission system plays in the overall design. The packaging of these vehicles often tends to be more difficult and restricted than other classes of vehicle and as a result the transmission consumes a greater percentage of the internal volume than the designer or the user would want.
While hybrid driveline technology is starting to have a great influence in the automotive and commercial sectors we have yet to see the defence market moving in the same direction. The reasons for this will be discussed in the context of both wheeled and tracked military vehicles, discussing why we might want this development and why it is rather slow in coming.
There will be plenty of opportunity for further discussion of the topic during our tour of the vehicles within the Defence Capability Centre that will follow this presentation.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Home
l Sitemap l Contact l Who we Are |
|
© Copyright 2009 British Gear Association. All
Rights Reserved
Registration in England: 2806604 Registered Address: British Gear Association (BGA), First Floor Suite 59, IMEX Business Centre, Shobnall Road, Burton on Trent
Staffordshire DE14 2AU Tel: 01283 515521 Fax: 01283 515841 Email: admin@bga.org.uk |
|